NZAU
Book a strategy call
AI Search

We Asked ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity to Recommend a Growth Agency in New Zealand. Here's Who They Picked, and Why.

More New Zealand businesses now ask an AI tool for a shortlist before they ask a colleague. So we asked too. We put 15 real buyer questions to ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, three rounds each, and logged 122 answers: every agency named, every source cited and every change between rounds.

What came back wasn't a league table. It was a clear picture of how AI engines decide who to recommend, how much those answers move, and why choosing a growth agency still takes data, strategy and some critical thinking.

How we ran the test

We wrote each question the way a business owner or marketing manager would type it, then ran it on all three engines from a New Zealand connection, with no chat history to steer the answers.

Setting What we did
Engines ChatGPT (web search on), Gemini and Perplexity, in the consumer apps buyers use
Dates 5 to 6 November 2026
Location New Zealand IP address
History Logged out or temporary chats, so past conversations didn't shape the answers
Rounds Three rounds per question per engine (Gemini's third round covers 2 of 15 questions)
Answers logged 122: 45 from ChatGPT, 45 from Perplexity, 32 from Gemini
Recorded Every business named and its position, every cited source, and the type of each source

The 15 questions covered five kinds of buyer intent:

Question type Example Questions
General shortlist "What's the best growth agency in New Zealand?" 4
Specific service "Which New Zealand agency is best for SEO and content marketing together?" 3
Problem-led "Our website traffic has dropped since Google's AI Overviews. Which NZ agency can help?" 4
How to choose "What should I look for when choosing a growth agency in New Zealand?" 2
Regional "Top marketing agencies in Wellington for growing a service business" 2

What we found

  • No agency owns the answer. 160 different agencies were named across 122 answers. The most-named agency appeared in about one answer in four.
  • Each engine relies on different evidence. Perplexity took 52% of its citations from agency directories. ChatGPT took 81% from agencies' own websites. Gemini mostly read agency sites, and in 6 of its 32 answers cited no source at all.
  • Answers move. Ask the same question again and Perplexity repeated about 65% of its names, ChatGPT 41% and Gemini 25%.
  • Specific beats general. The businesses named on narrow questions (AI search, B2B SEO, a named city, proving ROI) had a page that answered exactly that question, with evidence on it.

Stacked bar chart of each engine's cited sources by type. Perplexity, 401 sources: 52% directories, 27% agency websites, 17% listicles. Gemini, 89 sources: 18% directories, 70% agency websites, 8% listicles. ChatGPT, 187 sources: 6% directories, 81% agency websites, 11% review sites.

Across all three engines, directories made up 35% of the 677 sources cited. Sortlist alone was cited 84 times, more than any agency's own website. Listicles ("top agencies in NZ" articles) were cited 79 times, and Google reviews 21 times, almost all by ChatGPT.

Bar chart of the share of agency names repeated when the same question was asked again on the same engine: Perplexity 65%, ChatGPT 41%, Gemini 25%.

That volatility matters. A single AI answer is one sample, not a ranking. Anyone judging AI visibility from one screenshot, including an agency selling it, is reading noise.

Why the engines picked who they picked

Across 122 answers, the same reasons kept showing up. None of them was "biggest agency" or "biggest ad budget".

  1. A page that answers the exact question. On "Which NZ agencies can help my business show up in ChatGPT?", Adhesion was named first in every ChatGPT and Gemini round we ran, and its dedicated page on AI search was the source each time. Clear, specific pages get quoted.
  2. Directory listings, even thin ones. Agencies with only two reviews on a directory still appeared on page one of it, and in AI answers. A listing with no reviews was sometimes enough to be named.
  3. Third-party lists. "Best agencies in NZ" articles were heavily cited, including lists published on agency blogs. Being in the source material puts you in the answer.
  4. Proof with names and numbers. On "prove ROI" and "ads but no leads", the businesses named had case studies showing a named client and a measured result. Claims without proof didn't travel.
  5. Clear positioning by audience, place or size. Questions naming B2B, Wellington, Christchurch or SMEs went to businesses that said so plainly on a page, often backed by Google reviews.

We cover each of these signals in depth in Why AI Recommends Your Competitor Instead of You: 6 Signals Answer Engines Trust and Reviews, Directories and Reddit: The Off-Site Signals Quietly Feeding AI Answers.

Where Growth Partners showed up

On the questions about choosing a growth agency, two engines named Growth Partners and described what we do:

Engine Question asked What the engine said about Growth Partners
Gemini "Growth agency or digital marketing agency in NZ: which should I hire, and who's good?" Named first under "Leading Growth & Performance Agencies", for outcome-led strategy, revenue alignment and end-to-end sales funnel growth
ChatGPT "What should I look for when choosing a growth agency in New Zealand?" Recommended first for AI search visibility, covering traditional and AI search, with transparent indicative pricing

Both answers were built from our own website. Like most agencies in the test, we weren't named on every question, and the gaps follow the patterns above: directories and third-party lists, which is where our own off-site work is focused now.

What our DigitalArchitect® data adds

Our consumer-app test is a snapshot. DigitalArchitect®, step one of every Growth System, tracks AI visibility on a fixed schedule so results can be compared over time. It runs a saved set of 25 buyer prompts through five AI engines' developer APIs with live web search on: Perplexity, OpenAI, Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini and xAI's Grok. That's 125 calls a run. A call counts as a hit if Growth Partners is named in the answer, or if growthpartnersgpx.com appears in the sources cited.

The prompts are generated from the project brief, the 30 highest-volume keywords in our keyword research and facts from onboarding, and mix comparison, use-case, buying-stage, trust and problem-led questions.

Engine (API) Model Hits on our 20 September run
Perplexity sonar-pro 6 of 25
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search 4 of 25
Google Gemini 2.5 Flash with Search grounding 4 of 21 (4 calls hit a usage limit)
OpenAI gpt-5-mini with web search 3 of 25
xAI Grok 4 Fast 0 (all 25 calls failed: the search API was retired)
Total 17 of 125 calls (13.6%)

The headline score was 13.6%. Reading it properly takes three more questions:

  • Did every call return an answer? No. 29 of 125 calls failed and counted as misses. On the 96 calls that returned an answer, the rate is 17.7%.
  • Did the prompt already name us? Two prompts included "Growth Partners" and produced 8 of the 17 hits. That's expected, and it isn't discovery.
  • Was every match real? One answer used the phrase "long-term digital growth partners" in its general sense, and the name check counted it. We removed it. (We hand-checked every mention in our consumer-app test for the same reason.)

Bar chart of Growth Partners' AI visibility in the DigitalArchitect® run of 20 September 2026, counted three ways: headline score 13.6% (17 hits of 125 calls), answered calls only 17.7% (17 of 96, with 29 calls failed), unprompted discovery 9.1% (8 of 88, with own-name prompts and one false match removed).

Take all of that out and Growth Partners came up in 8 of 88 answers (9.1%) to prompts that don't mention us, and every one of those answers cited growthpartnersgpx.com. That's our closest measure of unprompted discovery: when a prospect asks something like "best digital growth agency in New Zealand", Growth Partners comes up in roughly 1 in 11 AI answers today.

The same data supports 9.1%, 13.6% or 17.7%, depending on how it's counted. All three are true. Only one answers the question a business owner cares about. That's why we show the working.

What this means when you choose a growth agency

An AI shortlist is a reasonable place to start. It isn't a verdict: engines rank what they can find and verify, not who will do the best work for your business. The same thinking that makes good search strategy makes a good agency choice: look at the evidence, ask how it was counted, and connect it to revenue.

What to look for Why it matters How Growth Partners does it
Evidence before a plan Strategy built on assumptions repeats them DigitalArchitect® is step one of every Growth System: market, competitor and AI search data before any recommendation
Search treated as one system AI answers draw on your site, directories, reviews and content at once Our full search stack covers SEO, AEO, GEO and AIO together, run by one search team
Honest measurement A visibility score depends on what's counted We separate prompted from unprompted mentions, failed calls from misses, and check matches by hand
Proof buyers and AI can cite Named results get repeated; vague claims don't Storyhouse, our creative team, produces the case studies, video and content that give buyers something to quote
A link to revenue Rankings and mentions only matter if they turn into customers The Growth System connects marketing, search and the sales process to revenue

Before you sign with anyone, ask them the questions this test raised. Which sources does AI cite in my category? How often does my business come up when nobody types my name? How do you count it? A good growth agency will answer with data, and show its working.

Where this fits

AI answers are one more place your buyers look, alongside Google, directories, reviews and referrals. Our search team works across the full search stack, so the evidence on your website and the signals off it are built together.

There's no single answer. Across 122 answers, three AI engines named 160 different agencies, and their lists changed between rounds. Treat an AI shortlist as a starting point and check the evidence behind each name.

With web search on, ChatGPT built its agency answers mostly from businesses' own websites (81% of its citations in our test), plus Google review data. Businesses with a page that closely matched the question were named first.

It depends on the engine. Perplexity relied on directories such as Sortlist, Semrush Agencies and Clutch for about half its citations. ChatGPT relied on agency websites. Gemini mixed the two and often cited no source.

No. Asked the same question again, Perplexity repeated about 65% of its names, ChatGPT 41% and Gemini 25%. Track AI visibility over time rather than judging from one answer.

Use a fixed set of buyer questions, run them regularly across several engines, and separate questions that name your business from ones that don't. Count failed calls separately and check each match by hand.

See how AI sees your business

We'll show you how often AI engines recommend your business when buyers don't type your name, which sources they rely on in your market, and where to focus first.

Book a strategy call

Trusted by teams at

Growth Partners clients include SiteMinder, MEX Engineering, Impact HR, SmartShelters, Hot Spring Spas, HR Profiling Solutions, Little Hotelier, Unistor, Storepro, Maple, GymQuip, Power Star Nutrition.